I am proud to be an
American and Islam is my religion
While some
among us attempt to delude themselves into thinking that we live in a
post-racial society, with each passing day it become abundantly clearer that
this concept is a farce. Racial tensions are increasing throughout the nation,
and negative attitudes towards minorities have exacerbated substantially, with
many thanks due to those who misuse religious principles to gain political
power while simultaneously backing racist arguments and ideas.
For example,
take hate-mongering administrative and senior advisory team of the newly
elected republican president Donald Trump who for their nasty hidden agenda
have attracted large evangelical Christian followers and far-right white
supremacists just to destroy more than 60 years of American civil liberty
success story? Many of us watch the ceremonies surrounding the presidential
executive orders on Muslim ban and are left scratching our heads, trying to
understand what about profanity and hate speech is so enticing to devoted
members the Christian faith.
While the
exact scope and meaning of the executive order continues to be deciphered, on
its face and as applied to date, Trump's order appears to violate several
international treaties ratified by the US, some provisions of which have been
incorporated into US law and cited as binding by the US Supreme Court. In
particular, the order seems to fly in the face of the 1967 Protocol Relating to
the Status of Refugees which updated the post-World War II Refugee Convention
of 1951, and other international human rights law that prohibits discrimination
on the basis of race, religion, or national origin.
One of the
reasons international law is so valuable is because the international community
of nations has developed it as protection against such abuses, both in our
country and around the world, often in the name of national security. International
law has learned from the past and made explicit that none of these violations
can be excused by an appeal to national security, nor should they be permitted
by an appeal to xenophobia.
The United
Nations Refugee Convention requires that the US provide protection and safe
haven to those facing persecution. By shutting the door to refugee admissions
whether temporarily or indefinitely, Trump's order flagrantly violates that
core obligation. This order also breaks with the long US tradition and history
(with some abhorrent exceptions that should never be repeated) of opening its
doors to refugees.
The UN High
Commissioner for Refugees and International Migration Organization noted this
proud tradition in a joint statement in reaction to the executive order.
"The long-standing US policy of welcoming refugees has created a win-win
situation: it has saved the lives of some of the most vulnerable people in the
world who have in turn enriched and strengthened their new societies," the
statement read. "The contribution of refugees and migrants to their new
homes worldwide has been overwhelmingly positive."
President
Trump has further publicly and falsely stated that his order will protect our
national security. But the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, acknowledging
states' legitimate interests in maintaining public security and combating
terrorism, has warned against the effects of making exceptions, or, in his
words, "the erosion of long-standing refugee protection principles". While
the order doesn't bar all Muslims from entering the US, barring immigration
entry from seven majority-Muslim countries, especially when paired with his
national security team's record of Islamophobia, leaves no doubt that Muslims
are the target of this order. While Trump's order places a moratorium on
refugee admissions and an indefinite halt on resettling refugees from Syria,
the order leaves an exception for "religious minorities". And while
the order's language is neutral, the president stated in a recent interview
with the Christian Broadcasting Company that he wants to provide priority to
Christian refugees.
But President
Trump's un-American and unconstitutional action doesn't just violate the
Refugee Convention - it flies in the face of other sources of international law
that bind us. The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Racial Discrimination, or ICERD, to which the US is bound, requires states
parties to "guarantee the right of everyone, without distinction as to
race, color, national or ethnic origin, to equality before the law."
US violations
of this treaty precede the Trump administration, and have already been so
flagrant and obvious that nearly identical concerns were addressed by the
ICERD's committee after 9/11. The Committee expressed concern at the US
government's discriminatory anti-terrorism measures and remarked that
"measures taken in the fight against terrorism must not discriminate, in
purpose or effect, on the grounds of race, color, descent, or national or
ethnic origin."
The one must
wonder if the Republicans are getting paid to write propaganda for ISIS. Anyone
works for ISIS would probably consider cutting the republican leadership a
check or at least a thank you card for all the hard work they’ve been doing,
helping create the narrative that the United States is so anti-Muslim, so
consumed with hatred with all things Islam, that they can’t even tell the
difference between bad guys like ISIS and the victims who are trying to find
safety, i.e. the Syrian refugees. If I were trying to stoke the Us vs. Them
narrative that ISIS uses to recruit people to join their apocalyptic
war-mongering cult, I would argue that “the West” hates the ordinary Muslim as
much as the ISIS fighter, so you might as well be the latter. But why should
ISIS bother writing that propaganda, when Republicans are willing to do it for
them?
The rush on
the right to blame the Syrian refugees for the attacks in Europe has been
breathtaking in its racism, and thoughtlessness. The excuse for the hysteria is
that ISIS could be hiding wannabe terrorists in the ranks, and that justifies
keeping them all out. This argument makes no sense, of course. Most, if not
all, of the terrorists in Europe were European nationals. Meanwhile, the
refugees are people who are trying to survive and many of them are trying not
to be forced to fight. Blaming them only makes sense if you have an irrational
fear and hatred of Muslims.
Of course, a
lot of Americans, particularly in the conservative base, do have an irrational
fear and hatred of Muslims, and so Republicans—who clearly see civil war,
terrorism, and a humanitarian crisis mostly as an opportunity to score
political points with the base—are pandering as hard as they can. Republican
governors are rushing forward to say they will not allow Syrian refugees to
enter their states. Most Republican presidential candidates picked up the same
message, that the way to fight ISIS is to refuse its victims shelter.
While the
cover story is fear of sleeper agents, the rhetoric shows that the real purpose
of this is to stoke hatred of Muslims and feed the Christian right’s narrative
about how this is a war between Christianity and Islam, starting with the
argument, originating with Ted Cruz, that it would be okay to take in Christian
refugees, but not Muslim ones.
Mike Huckabee went on Fox News and, in a stunningly overt bit of racism, sneered, “It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel.” Get it? They eat “weird” food and so they shouldn’t be allowed to live here! Did you know that many of these people have seen entire city blocks wiped out with bombs and have watched loved ones die in front of their eyes? But, weird food!
Mike Huckabee went on Fox News and, in a stunningly overt bit of racism, sneered, “It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel.” Get it? They eat “weird” food and so they shouldn’t be allowed to live here! Did you know that many of these people have seen entire city blocks wiped out with bombs and have watched loved ones die in front of their eyes? But, weird food!
Chris
Christie bragged that New Jersey won’t even accept “orphans under age 5.”
Because this is not and never was about legitimate fears of terrorism, but
about stoking right-wing hatred of Muslims, even those who aren’t even old
enough for school yet.
Many experts rushed forward to immediately explain that states don’t have a right to simply ban huge swaths of legal immigrants from living in their state, but it’s doubtful that any of these governors actually intended to try. It’s all posturing for the cameras, showing the conservative base that you hate and fear Muslims just as much as they do.
Luckily for ISIS, the propaganda that works for the Christian right works just as perfectly for ISIS! The only people who want a “clash of civilizations” between Christianity and Islam more than conservative Christians is ISIS, which is, at its heart, an apocalyptic cult that wants to conquer the non-believers, both non-Muslims and Muslims who have a different take on Islam than ISIS fundamentalists do. So, let us give big ups from ISIS to every conservative who feeds the ISIS narrative with their hysterical anti-Muslim bleating.
Many experts rushed forward to immediately explain that states don’t have a right to simply ban huge swaths of legal immigrants from living in their state, but it’s doubtful that any of these governors actually intended to try. It’s all posturing for the cameras, showing the conservative base that you hate and fear Muslims just as much as they do.
Luckily for ISIS, the propaganda that works for the Christian right works just as perfectly for ISIS! The only people who want a “clash of civilizations” between Christianity and Islam more than conservative Christians is ISIS, which is, at its heart, an apocalyptic cult that wants to conquer the non-believers, both non-Muslims and Muslims who have a different take on Islam than ISIS fundamentalists do. So, let us give big ups from ISIS to every conservative who feeds the ISIS narrative with their hysterical anti-Muslim bleating.
A lot of ISIS
propaganda bashes refugees, telling them that true Muslims should move to the
caliphate. Luckily for ISIS, Christian conservatives agree that the Syrian
refugees should go home. It is a Fact that ISIS and the Republicans are working
together to terrorize Syrian refugees. Nothing brings disparate people together
like hate, I guess.
ISIS holds some territory, but at its heart, it’s an idea: A twisted interpretation of Islam, coupled with an aggressive plan of terrorism and conquest. ISIS fights with bombs and guns made by the west, sure, but its main weapon is propaganda. The strategy is to convince people, mostly oppressed Muslims, to buy into the ISIS bullshit about some epic world-changing showdown, which definitely involves the West vs. ISIS. And so Republicans are giving them a gift: The more hate they pile on Muslims, the easier it is for ISIS to argue to potential recruits that peace is not possible and so all-out war is all there is left.
ISIS holds some territory, but at its heart, it’s an idea: A twisted interpretation of Islam, coupled with an aggressive plan of terrorism and conquest. ISIS fights with bombs and guns made by the west, sure, but its main weapon is propaganda. The strategy is to convince people, mostly oppressed Muslims, to buy into the ISIS bullshit about some epic world-changing showdown, which definitely involves the West vs. ISIS. And so Republicans are giving them a gift: The more hate they pile on Muslims, the easier it is for ISIS to argue to potential recruits that peace is not possible and so all-out war is all there is left.
The way to
fight propaganda is to get smart, persuasive counter-messages out there. The
United States needs to get the word out that ISIS kills Muslims (which they do,
in great numbers), but the U.S. helps save Muslim lives. The best way to do
this is to take in Syrian refugees and to be faithful to its longstanding
policy as the leader of the free world and the founder of the bill of rights.
It’s not just the right thing to do, but it’s just smart politics. It shows
that we reject, whole-heartedly, the ISIS narrative about clash of
civilizations, and that we want peace and unity between peace-loving people
everywhere. We can’t accomplish this goal while refusing to treat Syrian
refugees like human beings in need of help, which is what they are.
If you care
about breaking ISIS up and reducing violence, the first step is to take Syrian
refugees gladly, to show that we are better and more moral and more peaceable
than our enemies. Republicans refuse to do this; instead feeding the ISIS
propaganda machine and helping them recruit more people with their hate.
Looking over the landscape, it’s hard not to conclude that given a choice
between saving lives—not just Muslim lives, but the American lives that will be
lost if this conflict escalates—and scoring political points against the
Democrats, they will score their points rather than save lives.
The
international community has seen this before, and it has wisely created
mechanisms to stop history from repeating itself. International companies,
academic institutions, and even the international air transport association
have raised serious concerns regarding the detrimental impact of the order on
their staff and ability to conduct business. Even Trump's own employees took a
bold and public stance against the ban.
Trump's Muslim
ban has enraged world leaders and was condemned by UN officials. The secretary
general of the UN, Antonio Guterres, said that Trump's executive actions
"violate our basic principles … [and] are not effective if the objective
is to indeed avoid terrorists to enter the United States."
Additionally,
several UN human rights experts issued a joint statement blasting Trump's
immigration ban as discriminatory and in violation of US human rights
obligations. It shouldn't take the chancellor of another country or the top
refugee and human rights officials in the world to tell President Trump that
fear and xenophobia are no excuse for discrimination.
But if he won't listen to the UN or Chancellor Merkel or concerned companies, academic institutions, transport associations, human rights organizations, and over 100 diplomats, maybe he should listen to former US President Ronald Reagan, supposedly a hero of his. In 1980, a year after the Refugee Act was signed into law, the new president, just a few months into his presidency, re-affirmed the US' commitment to welcome the exiled.
"We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries," he said. "We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression."
But if he won't listen to the UN or Chancellor Merkel or concerned companies, academic institutions, transport associations, human rights organizations, and over 100 diplomats, maybe he should listen to former US President Ronald Reagan, supposedly a hero of his. In 1980, a year after the Refugee Act was signed into law, the new president, just a few months into his presidency, re-affirmed the US' commitment to welcome the exiled.
"We shall continue America's tradition as a land that welcomes peoples from other countries," he said. "We shall also, with other countries, continue to share in the responsibility of welcoming and resettling those who flee oppression."